Your browser does not have the flash player plug-in, you need to get it from www.flash.com 
Introduction   |   Residential Streets   |   Collector Streets   |   Rural Roads   |   Arterials & Highways
Parking Lots   |    Residential Driveways   |   Pathways   |   Recreational Facilities 
Heavy Industrial Facilities   |   Airfields   |   Site Paving   |   References
 

 

Parking Lots (Primarily Used by Automobiles)

Parking lots are paved areas intended for vehicle parking and can vary widely in size, function and design.  This page gives some general guidance when designing at-grade parking lot pavements. 

Figure 1: Large Parking Lot Figure 2: Smaller Parking Lot

Assumed Traffic
Low speed automobiles and trucks.  Typically, automobiles may travel anywhere in the parking lot while heavy trucks travel to and from delivery and pick-up points only.  Thus, recommended parking lot structural design is divided into two categories:

  1. Light loads.  Parking lot areas expected to experience little or no truck traffic can be designed for car and light truck loads only.  Typically light load parking lot areas encompass the parking stalls and parking stall access lanes.  Truck traffic in these areas is limited to a few medium trucks and the occasional heavy truck that may stray into the parking stall area after hours. 
Vehicle Type Vehicles
per day
Vehicles
per year
ESALs
per year
Cars and Light Trucks 1,000 365,000 250
Medium Trucks and Buses 10 3,650 1,000
Heavy Trucks and Buses occasional 10 10
Totals 1,010 368,660 1,260
  1. Heavy loads.  Parking areas expected to experience significant truck traffic should include a thicker pavement structure to accommodate these heavier loads.  Typically, heavy load parking lot areas encompass the entrance and exit lanes from the parking lot, the area directly in front of a store, truck loading/unloading areas and access routes to these areas.  The recommended minimum pavement thicknesses shown here are for typical parking lot heavy load areas.  If it is likely a particular parking lot will experience excessive heavy loads, it should be designed using an approved procedure.
Vehicle Type Vehicles
per day
Vehicles
per year
ESALs
per year
Cars and Light Trucks 5,000 2,000,000 1,400
Medium Trucks and Buses 10 3,650 1,000
Heavy Trucks and Buses 5 1,800 1,800
Totals 5,015 2,005,540 4,200

Design Considerations
In general, most owners like parking lots to be smooth, pedestrian friendly and easily maintainable for a minimal cost.  Specific considerations are:

  • Heavy truck traffic.  Most parking lots will experience at least some heavy truck traffic related to goods delivery and pick-up.  If possible, heavy truck travel should be restricted to designated areas and then only these areas should be designed to accommodate heavy truck loading.  Thus, pavements are made thicker where heavy trucks are likely to travel (e.g., to and from the loading dock) and are made thinner where only passenger cars and light trucks are expected (e.g., in the individual parking stalls). 
  • Design parking lot geometry to minimize handwork and maximize long straight paver pulls.  Handwork, the placement of HMA by hand shoveling and raking, is more expensive and results in a rougher surface texture than pavement placed by a paver.  Although these areas should last just as long as the rest of the parking lot, they often do not look as good and their roughness may be unpleasant to walk on or roll a shopping cart across.  In short, the less handwork the better.  Additionally, the highest quality pavement is generally placed by a continuously moving paver that does not have to repeatedly stop and start.  Specific guidance follows:

    • Design parking plans should allow for long, uninterrupted, straight paver pulls.  Unusual, non-square geometry and odd-shaped islands make for short paver pulls and create portions of the parking lot inaccessible to the paver that have to be paved by hand. 

    • Minimize the use of planter islands in the middle of the parking lot.  Lots of planter islands result in shorter paver pulls and more paver-inaccessible areas requiring handwork.  As an alternative, consider placing planters around the parking lot perimeter or paving the parking lot then sawcutting out areas to be built into planters.

    • Drains should follow straight lines so the paver can parallel these lines during laydown.  Since only a fixed contour can be laid in one pass of an asphalt paver, designs calling for a meandering gutter or valley require hand placing.

    • Drain lines that parallel the long dimension of the parking lot allow for longer paver pulls.

  • Drainage.  Well-drained parking lots last significantly longer than poorly drained parking lots.  To ensure adequate drainage:

    • Design parking lots with a minimum slope of 2 percent (0.25 inches per foot).  Slopes less than this are difficult to construct and may not prevent pooling of water during wet weather.  It is extremely difficult to prevent pooling in parking lots sloped less than 1 percent.

    • Where parking lot geometry necessitates hand placed pavement, an increase in minimum slope to 4 percent (0.5 inches per foot) should be considered.  Fine grade control is more difficult with hand placement than with machine placement.

    • Parking lots placed in cut areas are more susceptible to moisture problems.  When placing a parking lot in a large cut area cannot be avoided, take extra care in developing a good drainage plan.

  • Consider using a HMA finer than standard WSDOT mixes.  Usually the finer gradation of a Modified Class B (Commercial Mix) or the smaller nominal maximum aggregate size of a Class G mix will result in a very smooth, pedestrian friendly surface. 

  • Consider using slightly more asphalt binder than standard WSDOT mixesMore asphalt binder (on the order of 0.5 percent more than a standard WSDOT mix) will ease placement and help create a smooth, pedestrian friendly surface.  Typically, increased asphalt binder content makes a pavement more susceptible to rutting, however in a parking lot area where few, if any, trucks are expected rutting is not a great concern.

Construction Considerations

  • It is important to maintain adequate drainage during construction and keep water away from the subgrade soil to be paved over.  A saturated subgrade soil will be weak and may not adequately support the overlying pavement leading to depressions and fatigue cracking.
  • The subgrade should be graded to the final desired parking lot elevation minus the planned pavement thickness.  It is difficult to make up grade differences with pavement thickness alone.  The subgrade should have a maximum variance of 0.75 inches per 10 feet.
  • Where there is the possibility of recurrent vegetation growth, a quality commercial grade herbicide should be used.
  • Parking lots are ideal candidates for site paving in advance of construction.
  • Generally, a prime coat underneath a parking lot is not warranted.

Maintenance Considerations
Once completed, parking lot pavements can last a long time.  Generally, loads are low so the primary modes of deterioration are subgrade failures and aging effects such as block cracking and raveling

  • Cracks should be sealed in a timely manner to prevent water infiltration into the subgrade through the cracks. 
  • A periodic application of a fog seal or slurry seal can prolong parking lot pavement life and improve its appearance.
  • In Eastern Washington and areas where it frequently snows, planter islands are difficult to locate underneath a layer of snow and are often damaged by snowplows.  Consider marking these islands or only building them on the parking lot perimeter.
  • In Eastern Washington and areas where it frequently snows, consider plowing snow completely off the pavement.  Large snow piles from plowing operations that sit on pavement surfaces will melt and may result in water infiltration into the subgrade.

Recommended References

 

Recommended Minimum Pavement Thickness and Design (inches)


Light Traffic

WAPA Design Checklist  •  Standard Washington Mixes  •  Subgrade  •  Material Substitutions  •  ATB


Heavy Traffic

WAPA Design Checklist  •  Standard Washington Mixes  •  Subgrade  •  Material Substitutions  •  ATB
 

 

t Previous Top   Next u

© 2002, Washington Asphalt Pavement Association, Inc.  (disclaimer, credits)