| |
Specifications
Specifications are used (1) to convey information concerning desired products
from a buyer to a seller or potential seller, (2) as a basis for
competitive bidding for the delivery of products, and (3) to measure
compliance to contracts. Typically, four types of specifications;
proprietary product, method, end-result and performance specifications; are generally
recognized in the construction industry.

Figure 1: Some WSDOT Standard
Specifications from 1963 - 2000
This section is largely taken from a series of three articles written for
HMAT Magazine and a Washington State DOT research report as listed below:
- Newcomb, D.E. and Epps, J.A. (Jan/Feb 2001). Statistical
Specifications for Hot Mix Asphalt: What Do We Need to Know? HMAT,
vol. 6, no. 1. National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA).
Landham, MD. (first in a series of 3 articles)
- Newcomb, D.E. and Epps, J.A. (Mar/April 2001). Statistical
Specifications for Hot Mix Asphalt: What Do We Need to Know? HMAT,
vol. 6, no. 2. National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA).
Landham, MD. (second in a series of 3 articles)
- Newcomb, D.E. (May/June 2001). Performance Related
Specifications Developments. HMAT, vol. 6, no. 3. National
Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA). Landham, MD. (third in a
series of 3 articles)
- Muench, S.T. and Mahoney, J.P. (2001). A Quantification and
Evaluation of WSDOT’s Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Statistical Acceptance
Specification. WA-RD 517.1. Washington State Department of
Transportation, Transportation Center (TRAC). Seattle, WA. (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ppsc/research/CompleteReports/WARD517_1HotMixAsphalt.pdf).
A proprietary product specification is used when a generic description of a
desired product or process cannot be easily formulated. It usually
contains an "or equivalent" clause to allow for some measure of competition in
providing the product. It is generally acknowledged that such a
specification severely limits competition, increases cost, provides little latitude for innovation, and puts substantial risk on the owner for
product performance. Most agencies avoid this type of specification
whenever possible, however private owners often use them.
A method specification outlines a specific materials selection and
construction operation process to be followed in providing a product. In
the past, many construction specifications were written in this manner. A
contractor would be told what type of material to produce, what equipment to use
and in what manner it was to be used in construction. In its
strictest sense, only the final form of the structure can be stipulated (for
instance, the thickness of the pavement layers). This type of
specification allows for a greater degree of competition than the proprietary
product specification, but as long as the structure is built according to the
materials and methods stipulated, the owner bears the responsibility for the
performance.
Although widely used, method specifications have several key disadvantages.
First, they tend to stifle contractor innovation because there is virtually no incentive to
develop better, more efficient construction methods. Second, since they
are not statistically based and 100 percent compliance is usually not possible,
method specifications usually required “substantial compliance,” a purposely
vague and undefined term that can lead to disputes. Finally, spot checks of material quality,
which are often used in method specifications, do not
reflect overall material quality because they are taken from subjectively
determined non-random locations. Since they are not random, these spot
checks have no statistical validity and therefore do not reflect overall
material quality.
Despite their flaws, method specifications are still widely used on the local
agency level (e.g., counties, small cities, towns, etc.). In general, this
is because they are familiar, straightforward to write and can be implemented with
minimal agency involvement. Local agencies often lack the expertise and
resources required to use statistical specifications or warranties.
An end-result specification is one in which the final characteristics of the
product are stipulated, and the contractor is given considerable freedom in
achieving those characteristics. In their roughest form, they specify
minimum, maximum or a range of values for any given characteristic and base
acceptance on conformance to these specifications. For instance, they may
state a minimum layer thickness or a range of
in-place air voids.
Since it is impractical to measure every square foot of constructed
pavement, end-result specifications use statistical methods to estimate overall
material quality based on a limited number of random samples. Therefore, end result specifications improve on
methods specifications in two
key areas: (1) they shift the focus away from methods and on to final product
quality and (2) they do not rely on the nebulous "substantial compliance"
because they clearly define acceptable quality.
Today, most large State and Federal pavement contracts use statistically based end-result specifications
that incorporate some elements of method specifications (usually used to guard
against early failure of the product). These end-result specifications are
often referred to as a "quality assurance specifications", "QA/QC
specifications" or "QC/QA specifications". Essentially, these specifications specify the
end results and also specify certain minimum construction method requirements
(e.g., temperatures below which paving is not allowed, descriptions of initial
test sections, minimum number of rollers, conditions under which the agency may
halt paving operations, etc.).
End result specifications assign pavement construction quality to the contractor, they define the desired
final product, and they allow the contractor significant latitude in achieving
that final product. This leads to innovation, efficiency, and lower costs.
However, these specifications and their statistical sampling requirements are
often too complex and resource intensive to be used at the local agency level.
Performance specifications are those in which the product payment is directly
dependent upon its actual performance. Typical of these specifications are
warranty, limited warranty and design-build-operate contracts. Contractors
are held responsible for the product performance within the context of what they
have control over. The contractor is given a great deal of leeway in
providing the product, as long as it performs according to established
guidelines. In this case, the contractor assumes considerable risk for the
level of service the product provides by paying for or providing any necessary
maintenance or repair within the warranty period.
|
|