| |
Marshall Method
Although WSDOT does not use the Marshall method, many
private laboratories do because it is a proven method and requires relatively
light, portable and inexpensive equipment. Like the Hveem and Superpave
methods, the Marshall method has been proven to produce quality HMA from which long-lasting
pavements can be constructed. This section briefly discusses the Marshall
mix design
method. The basic concepts of the Marshall mix design method
were originally developed by Bruce Marshall of the Mississippi Highway
Department around 1939 and then refined by the U.S. Army.
Typically, the Marshall mix design method consists of
three basic steps:
- Aggregate selection. Different agencies/owners specify
different methods of aggregate acceptance. Private labs may or may not
run periodic
aggregate physical tests on
a particular aggregate
source. For each mix design,
gradation and
size requirements are
checked. Often, aggregate from more than one source is required to
meet gradation requirements.
- Asphalt binder selection. WSDOT uses the
Superpave PG system
for asphalt binder specification and therefore it is becoming more accepted in
private industry. Older specifications may refer to the
now-replaced aged residue (AR) system. Commonly used grades in the AR
system were AR-4000W and AR-2000W.
- Optimum asphalt binder content determination. In the Marshall
method, this step can be broken up into 5 substeps:
- Prepare a series of initial samples, each at a different asphalt binder content.
For instance, two to three samples each might be made at 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0
and 6.5
percent asphalt by dry weight for a total of 10 to 15 samples. There
should be at least two samples above and two below the estimated optimum
asphalt content.
- Compact these trial mixes using the Marshall drop hammer (see
Figure 1).
This hammer is specific to the Marshall mix design method.
- Test the samples in the Marshall testing machine (see Figure 2) for
stability and flow. This testing machine is specific to the Marshall
mix design method. Passing
values of stability and flow depend upon the mix class being evaluated.
- Determine the density and other volumetric properties of the samples.
- Select the optimum asphalt binder content. The asphalt binder
content corresponding to 4 percent air voids is selected as long as this
binder content passes stability and flow requirements.
Basic Marshall mix design specifications
from the Asphalt Institute are shown in the table below. This table does not list all
specifications.
Table 1: Basic Marshall Mix Design Specifications (from
the Asphalt Institute, 1997)
| Mix Criteria |
Light Traffic
(< 104 ESALs) |
Medium Traffic
(104 - 106
ESALs) |
Heavy Traffic
(> 106
ESALs) |
| Min. |
Max. |
Min. |
Max. |
Min. |
Max. |
|
Compaction
(number of blows on each end of the sample) |
35 |
50 |
75 |
| Stability |
500 lbs. |
750 lbs. |
1500 lbs. |
|
Flow
(in units of 0.01 inches) |
8 |
20 |
8 |
18 |
8 |
16 |
| Percent Air Voids |
3 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
|
|