Your browser does not have the flash player plug-in, you need to get it from www.flash.com 
Fundamentals   |   Hveem Method   |   Marshall Method   |   Superpave Method   |   References  

 

Marshall Method

Although WSDOT does not use the Marshall method, many private laboratories do because it is a proven method and requires relatively light, portable and inexpensive equipment.  Like the Hveem and Superpave methods, the Marshall method has been proven to produce quality HMA from which long-lasting pavements can be constructed.  This section briefly discusses the Marshall mix design method.

The basic concepts of the Marshall mix design method were originally developed by Bruce Marshall of the Mississippi Highway Department around 1939 and then refined by the U.S. Army.

Typically, the Marshall mix design method consists of three basic steps:

  1. Aggregate selection.  Different agencies/owners specify different methods of aggregate acceptance.  Private labs may or may not run periodic aggregate physical tests on a particular aggregate source.  For each mix design, gradation and size requirements are checked.  Often, aggregate from more than one source is required to meet gradation requirements.
  2. Asphalt binder selection.  WSDOT uses the Superpave PG system for asphalt binder specification and therefore it is becoming more accepted in private industry.   Older specifications may refer to the now-replaced aged residue (AR) system.  Commonly used grades in the AR system were AR-4000W and AR-2000W. 
  1. Optimum asphalt binder content determination.  In the Marshall method, this step can be broken up into 5 substeps:
    • Prepare a series of initial samples, each at a different asphalt binder content.  For instance, two to three samples each might be made at 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.5 percent asphalt by dry weight for a total of 10 to 15 samples.  There should be at least two samples above and two below the estimated optimum asphalt content.
    • Compact these trial mixes using the Marshall drop hammer (see Figure 1).  This hammer is specific to the Marshall mix design method.    
    • Test the samples in the Marshall testing machine (see Figure 2) for stability and flow.  This testing machine is specific to the Marshall mix design method.  Passing values of stability and flow depend upon the mix class being evaluated. 
    • Determine the density and other volumetric properties of the samples.
    • Select the optimum asphalt binder content.  The asphalt binder content corresponding to 4 percent air voids is selected as long as this binder content passes stability and flow requirements.

Basic Marshall mix design specifications from the Asphalt Institute are shown in the table below.  This table does not list all specifications

Table 1: Basic Marshall Mix Design Specifications (from the Asphalt Institute, 1997)

Mix Criteria Light Traffic
(< 104 ESALs)
Medium Traffic
(104 - 106 ESALs)
Heavy Traffic
(> 106 ESALs)
Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max.

Compaction
(number of blows on each end of the sample)

35 50 75
Stability 500 lbs. 750 lbs. 1500 lbs.

Flow
 (in units of 0.01 inches)

8 20 8 18 8 16
Percent Air Voids 3 5 3 5 3 5

 

 

t Previous Top   Next u

© 2002, Washington Asphalt Pavement Association, Inc.  (disclaimer, credits)